best practices is the most fundamental component of a supplier audit from sdfbcx's blog

When it comes to quality inspection servicesaudits, there has long been debate about whether or not they are truly effective at identifying risks in the supply chain; however, when done correctly, they can be both cost-effective and efficient.

First article inspection relationship auditing is a valuable and necessary tool when it comes to managing inspections companies relationships. Many of the problems associated with auditing, on the other hand, are caused by the relative ease with which they can be manipulated. Just look at the media frenzy that erupted last year around clothing retailer Boohoo after it was revealed that some of the company's UK suppliers in Leicester were paying employees £3.50 an hour and failing to adequately protect them from Covid-19 risks, despite factory audits having been carried out on the premises.

Employees require alternative means of expressing their concerns, according to an Oxfam study published earlier this year, because auditing and compliance procedures have failed to resolve their issues in the vast majority of cases. According to Luke Smitham, senior consultant at Kumi Consulting, in an interview with Supply Management, auditing has become commoditized, and it is in the best interests of businesses to hire the best auditors they can find and to expect a lot from them.

There are a plethora of restrictions. according to the author. Make sure to use audits sparingly and only when absolutely necessary if you intend to use them. Take into consideration where and why you intend to use them. What exactly is the driving force behind this decision? It is fundamentally for the purpose of being able to claim that you conducted an audit and that, if something goes wrong, it was not your fault. In other words, is it to gain an understanding of and a comprehensive perspective of a manufacturing facility?

Whatever happens, auditing will continue to be one of the most common methods for businesses to gain insight into their supply chains, regardless of the circumstances. According to Todd Bradley-Cole, senior manager, corporate social responsibility at the John Lewis Partnership (JLP), despite the fact that audits are not always the most effective method of monitoring supply chain risks, audits can still be a valuable tool in developing stronger relationships with suppliers, according to Supply Management.

The low wages and gender discrimination that have been discovered in Indian factories are two of the most common risks, while workers in China have been subjected to extremely long working hours on a regular basis, according to Smitham. All of these risks are common in factory environments, and businesses should take them into consideration both before beginning an audit and when reviewing the information gathered as a result of the audit. As Smitham points out, if you do receive audit reports, it is perfectly acceptable to be skeptical of them and to raise concerns about their findings.

A significant difference will be made in the final outcome depending on the style of audits you conduct and the auditor you choose to carry out the necessary legwork. As Bradley-Cole points out, analyzing systems for purposes such as confirming identities, determining whether or not employees have proper bank accounts, and determining whether or not they are being paid properly are only a piece of the puzzle. He describes the process as follows: "Perhaps the most important element for us was the one-on-one interviews with the employees."They delivered an exceptional performance, in my opinion.

Bradley-Cole emphasizes the importance of selecting a partner who is appropriately qualified in order to ensure that the interviewing process is as effective as possible, according to the author.  In the case of an evaluation of a supplier located in another country, he suggests that the auditors be fluent in the language of the ISO9000 Quality System Audit, or even multiple languages, in order to create a more comfortable environment for employees to discuss their experiences. Additionally, when conducting its own audits, JLP took this into consideration.

Taking a sample of the workers to determine what languages they spoke and then ensuring that the auditors could communicate with them in their native language was something we were about to embark on. Essentially, it is about ensuring that employees are heard and that they feel comfortable enough to express themselves without fear of reprisal or retaliation. Additionally, you will gain valuable knowledge about practical systems issues by participating in an open discussion in which you will be able to contribute and learn a great deal more.

We had pre-audit conversations solely for the purpose of setting expectations for what we would be doing during the audit. In order to share information in an open forum, we were requesting that they refrain from informing others or changing their behavior. In addition, there is no danger to the general public, and we have no intention of using it as a means of punishing anyone. According to the coach, you should begin with an extremely open engagement.


Previous post     
     Blog home

The Wall

No comments
You need to sign in to comment