Amerzone's blog
My other thing is what's the point of making these already worthless items have value? For the sake of getting worth? They are worthless because of this RS07 Gold. It's like carrying some other everyday low cost thing or rice and making it obscenely expensive? Other than somebody is making money from the price gouge, it would not flow with the rest of the market since the two things aren't intended to be paired together. It's simple economics bruh. And the whole detection process is only a band-aid on a notion lol. What's the purpose?
The majority of those things are only"worthless" because of bottling or massive resource influx from terrible boss drop tables. They never used to be unworthy back in 07 or for quite a long time in OSRS. Also, RuneScape has basically zero thing sinks because of deaths being 100% secure for many years now. Items not being sunk will always lose value as new ones come into RuneScape far quicker than players want them. Because it's occurring slow for high value items doesn't mean it is not happening. It's not like this is proposing we unnaturally create bamboo longbow(un ) 10k for the day.
Earning skilling for money worthwhile again, there's absolutely no gain in promoting smelted swords, combined potions, and crafted Armour, and very little gain from gathering skills, should you cut the quantities of stuff in the current market, these things will grow more precious again. Imagine leveled players that are low smithing steel scimitars and selling them for gain, this can actually occur.
I don't believe you thought this through. If, by way of instance, we take yew logs as the item for a day then that which we would get is temporary hyperinflation. Each of the assholes that are wealthy would buy out as many logs as they could while men and women attempt to flip these logs. The casual skillers training fletching with yew longs will then have to compete with these rich assholes either purchasing things or buying these logs just to delete them to attempt and sell to wealthy assholes at prices that are discounted.
The profitability of these things for low level skillers would also be a non problem. It is more likely we will see a bot farm dip every yew shrub into extinction due to a guaranteed demand from individuals with money, which would push out all the actual level skillers. This is a terrible idea.
It's declared on the day no? There's no purpose to a item of this day. This is talking about what happens on the day. Many times, the players are the people who play with the most Buy Old School RuneScape Gold. They'll be here every day when the thing changes to buy them all out to sacrifice to your dumb hole or resell at a sign up. Just because it's not declared doesn't mean it's not going to occur. You are severely underestimating this community works.
The majority of those things are only"worthless" because of bottling or massive resource influx from terrible boss drop tables. They never used to be unworthy back in 07 or for quite a long time in OSRS. Also, RuneScape has basically zero thing sinks because of deaths being 100% secure for many years now. Items not being sunk will always lose value as new ones come into RuneScape far quicker than players want them. Because it's occurring slow for high value items doesn't mean it is not happening. It's not like this is proposing we unnaturally create bamboo longbow(un ) 10k for the day.
Earning skilling for money worthwhile again, there's absolutely no gain in promoting smelted swords, combined potions, and crafted Armour, and very little gain from gathering skills, should you cut the quantities of stuff in the current market, these things will grow more precious again. Imagine leveled players that are low smithing steel scimitars and selling them for gain, this can actually occur.
I don't believe you thought this through. If, by way of instance, we take yew logs as the item for a day then that which we would get is temporary hyperinflation. Each of the assholes that are wealthy would buy out as many logs as they could while men and women attempt to flip these logs. The casual skillers training fletching with yew longs will then have to compete with these rich assholes either purchasing things or buying these logs just to delete them to attempt and sell to wealthy assholes at prices that are discounted.
The profitability of these things for low level skillers would also be a non problem. It is more likely we will see a bot farm dip every yew shrub into extinction due to a guaranteed demand from individuals with money, which would push out all the actual level skillers. This is a terrible idea.
It's declared on the day no? There's no purpose to a item of this day. This is talking about what happens on the day. Many times, the players are the people who play with the most Buy Old School RuneScape Gold. They'll be here every day when the thing changes to buy them all out to sacrifice to your dumb hole or resell at a sign up. Just because it's not declared doesn't mean it's not going to occur. You are severely underestimating this community works.
I enjoyed the demonstration. This felt like I went back with a cleaner landscape and travel choices, into Diablo II. The random experiences were cool rather than overpowering. It was nice to see players in the combination and know that if I wished to, then I could follow along on whatever mission they worked on Diablo IV Gold. The NPC experiences are exactly what they are, kinda individuals hanging out waiting for one to come do some thing. But it is a demo, so see before the game comes out, what happens in the remainder of the development and I will forgive them. However, the graphics were pretty amazing all the way around.
Except she is squishy So far as the characters go, I was digging on out the Sorceress. The demo gives you 50 health insurances only in case, and hauled through half of them becoming around. The Barbarian is much what you'd expect, a tank character that will cut stuff down however you have to get in close and you open up to hurt. Since he could summon spells and creatures to assist him the Druid was my surprise favorite. My favorite turned to both a werewolf and a freakin' keep to rip people apart with.
I had a wonderful time playing Diablo IV, I just wish it wasn't on a timer. That is likely to wind up being a match that I could spend hundreds of hours playing, although I understand considering we had been in a seminar. Hopefully, within the next six months, Blizzard will offer that demonstration to the public to test out.
At BlizzCon 2018, fans reacted to the statement of Diablo Immortal in an way. While there were several contributing factors to describe that reaction, the recent statement of some full fledged Path of Exile Mobile match which sacrifices none of the PC version's complexity makes it crystal clear that Diablo 3 might easily be a cellular port, and would be a far better option than Diablo Immortal.
The announcement trailer for Path of Exile Mobile, shown below, jabs -- without much subtlety -- in how the programmers wanted to make a game without a compromise, which is to say, a wonderful game that just so happened to be played on a phone. Without naming Diablo Immortalthey record most of the complaints which players have against that forthcoming project, including how it isn't being developed by Blizzard, but was farmed out to a third party, and the way that it is a watered-down variant of the game on PC.
Years ago, the notion of porting Diablo 3 on a phone could have been a touch too extreme, but with the increasing power of smart phones, the recognized notion of playing less powerful hardware with the successful Nintendo Switch interface, as well as the visuals of Diablo Immortal that we've seen up to now, this is no longer the situation.
Not porting Diablo 3 to phones is a missed opportunity, especially because cross development between platforms could have been a significant selling point not just for those who still play with the sport buy Diablo 4 Gold, but to lure players to buy it for the very first time on PC or console. Imagine knowing that progression made counted as an example, towards a Journey and having a Diablo 3 game on your phone.
Beyond that, the case for Diablo 3 being ported to mobile devices could be made because the game is such a sequel compared to Diablo two or Path of Exile. There is little in terms of decision making for gear and best end game builds, and if Path of Exile can accommodate its system of vast, complex character customization, there's not any good reason for Diablo 3 not to work as well.
Except she is squishy So far as the characters go, I was digging on out the Sorceress. The demo gives you 50 health insurances only in case, and hauled through half of them becoming around. The Barbarian is much what you'd expect, a tank character that will cut stuff down however you have to get in close and you open up to hurt. Since he could summon spells and creatures to assist him the Druid was my surprise favorite. My favorite turned to both a werewolf and a freakin' keep to rip people apart with.
I had a wonderful time playing Diablo IV, I just wish it wasn't on a timer. That is likely to wind up being a match that I could spend hundreds of hours playing, although I understand considering we had been in a seminar. Hopefully, within the next six months, Blizzard will offer that demonstration to the public to test out.
At BlizzCon 2018, fans reacted to the statement of Diablo Immortal in an way. While there were several contributing factors to describe that reaction, the recent statement of some full fledged Path of Exile Mobile match which sacrifices none of the PC version's complexity makes it crystal clear that Diablo 3 might easily be a cellular port, and would be a far better option than Diablo Immortal.
The announcement trailer for Path of Exile Mobile, shown below, jabs -- without much subtlety -- in how the programmers wanted to make a game without a compromise, which is to say, a wonderful game that just so happened to be played on a phone. Without naming Diablo Immortalthey record most of the complaints which players have against that forthcoming project, including how it isn't being developed by Blizzard, but was farmed out to a third party, and the way that it is a watered-down variant of the game on PC.
Years ago, the notion of porting Diablo 3 on a phone could have been a touch too extreme, but with the increasing power of smart phones, the recognized notion of playing less powerful hardware with the successful Nintendo Switch interface, as well as the visuals of Diablo Immortal that we've seen up to now, this is no longer the situation.
Not porting Diablo 3 to phones is a missed opportunity, especially because cross development between platforms could have been a significant selling point not just for those who still play with the sport buy Diablo 4 Gold, but to lure players to buy it for the very first time on PC or console. Imagine knowing that progression made counted as an example, towards a Journey and having a Diablo 3 game on your phone.
Beyond that, the case for Diablo 3 being ported to mobile devices could be made because the game is such a sequel compared to Diablo two or Path of Exile. There is little in terms of decision making for gear and best end game builds, and if Path of Exile can accommodate its system of vast, complex character customization, there's not any good reason for Diablo 3 not to work as well.
Let's be fair, 2K is unreliable for anything. Only reason we purchase it and play it a lot is because there's literally no competition. It sucks cause it does not simulate basketball. You can get excellent in NBA 2K Coins but it's basically by studying NBA 2K20 of 2K and not NBA 2K20 of basketball. I've been building the ideal sliders for my league and I believe with the ideal tuning you can get near some simulation.
In order for it to be a true simulation, they don't have enough off ball motion or intelligent. You might be able to replicate realistic stats that is fine if that's what you need but you are not gont great representations of groups plays in there.I do not actually realize what you're saying. I'm saying 2K does not have smart basketball play assembled into NBA 2K20 for it to be a true simulation. Players don't split shooters if their teammates rotate over, bumping in the corner pick and rolls doesn't work well, etc.. You are able to make players perform equally but 2K does not have smart enough AI to make it actually resemble NBA basketball.
Fun games do not simulate the exact experience, they emulate exactly what it's like. Nobody wants 2K if it was sensible. But they created actually everything tunable down and put in myleague. You can spend hours on those configurations, yet it pointless when the AI is trash. If their goal was to ensure it is not realistic they ought to take out those settings and make NBA 2K20 better. 2K is far from NBA basketball, it is essentially emulating high school pickup games, which can be fine, but a few people wish to play legit NBA games.
NBA 2K20 play is indeed broken it does not really matter anyhow. I made a max height center and it does not matter what you are. You get easy post baskets and can find every rebound all game. If you are reffering to the my livelihood stuff most comp facilities are just 6'10 or 6'11. Once I get a open lane onto my maximum height maximum weight Glock I laugh my ass off and he puts a ass layup up despite the fact that his armpits are over the rim.
There's a lot wrong with 2K but I would say NBA 2K20 play is very solid.It was solid 3-4 years back the last time they made any substantial changes to this AI. In my view they really failed to adapt to the NBA. Three out is not the standard for teams now, facilities stand around in the mid century way a lot in NBA 2K20, too many shooters cut during a fastbreak if they need to be standing in the corner. They have/had outside 5 but patched it out since that offense runs. It is dumb as fuck teams are not made by it like the Pocket Rockets unworthy or not work like their real life counter parts.
If they place dividing the shooters (along with other smart rotational schemes) to NBA 2K20 and possess the facilities not adhere to their man so much and focus more on the rim protection it would not be a problem.they can't even mend fastbreak defense lmfao AI on a fastbreak with Cheap NBA 2K21 MT somebody on them is obviously a layup. Defenders on ball iq means nothing. In case the ballhandler dribbles close after abandoning their guy that AI will always always always reach in to get a foul. Then there's the fact AI screens offball never work cause the man cuts before the display is set and they place the screen. There's so much wrong when I perform myleague and perform rebuilds.
In order for it to be a true simulation, they don't have enough off ball motion or intelligent. You might be able to replicate realistic stats that is fine if that's what you need but you are not gont great representations of groups plays in there.I do not actually realize what you're saying. I'm saying 2K does not have smart basketball play assembled into NBA 2K20 for it to be a true simulation. Players don't split shooters if their teammates rotate over, bumping in the corner pick and rolls doesn't work well, etc.. You are able to make players perform equally but 2K does not have smart enough AI to make it actually resemble NBA basketball.
Fun games do not simulate the exact experience, they emulate exactly what it's like. Nobody wants 2K if it was sensible. But they created actually everything tunable down and put in myleague. You can spend hours on those configurations, yet it pointless when the AI is trash. If their goal was to ensure it is not realistic they ought to take out those settings and make NBA 2K20 better. 2K is far from NBA basketball, it is essentially emulating high school pickup games, which can be fine, but a few people wish to play legit NBA games.
NBA 2K20 play is indeed broken it does not really matter anyhow. I made a max height center and it does not matter what you are. You get easy post baskets and can find every rebound all game. If you are reffering to the my livelihood stuff most comp facilities are just 6'10 or 6'11. Once I get a open lane onto my maximum height maximum weight Glock I laugh my ass off and he puts a ass layup up despite the fact that his armpits are over the rim.
There's a lot wrong with 2K but I would say NBA 2K20 play is very solid.It was solid 3-4 years back the last time they made any substantial changes to this AI. In my view they really failed to adapt to the NBA. Three out is not the standard for teams now, facilities stand around in the mid century way a lot in NBA 2K20, too many shooters cut during a fastbreak if they need to be standing in the corner. They have/had outside 5 but patched it out since that offense runs. It is dumb as fuck teams are not made by it like the Pocket Rockets unworthy or not work like their real life counter parts.
If they place dividing the shooters (along with other smart rotational schemes) to NBA 2K20 and possess the facilities not adhere to their man so much and focus more on the rim protection it would not be a problem.they can't even mend fastbreak defense lmfao AI on a fastbreak with Cheap NBA 2K21 MT somebody on them is obviously a layup. Defenders on ball iq means nothing. In case the ballhandler dribbles close after abandoning their guy that AI will always always always reach in to get a foul. Then there's the fact AI screens offball never work cause the man cuts before the display is set and they place the screen. There's so much wrong when I perform myleague and perform rebuilds.
