Skyzhay's blog
I work in market research and Qualtrics is a industry pillar. I understand but my experience let's me think it is alright if you do not feel comfortable with Qualtrics. Let's say I replied this survey frankly, who'd you imagine gets that data? After GDPR I've felt2007 RS Items pressured with every single site ever to monitor and monitor me it is disgusting, and even more disgusting that it was happening before without my knowledge. Taking a look at the survey link along with the basic disclosures at the bottom of the page it doesn't seem the Jagex is having a third-party company so if the only people who would have direct access to your information are the survey programmers who can pull exports out of the database to disperse internally. EU also has some pretty strong data privacy legislation that (at least my US based company which frequently interacts with Qualtrics links) are followed pretty strictly by the survey programmers and information hosting sites.
After running through the poll Jagex definitely appears to be operating solo on this one. No third party firm would allow participants directly enter in their contact info (because it would mean they'd lose your business to their customer [so not a nefarious thing]) and also the only area I found kinda strange was that the telephone number request at the conclusion. I would have substituted that using a check box for recontacting and pipe-in the email that you could optionally have put in earlier for confirmation. I think you are fine answering this questionnaire when you have privacy concerns since essentially all information is unknown and it's using an industry-standard platform of Qualtrics. Jagex probably does not have market study ISO certificates but this is a quick yearly survey so they would not need to have any.
I hope this feedback encourages the staff to make surveys more concentrated to the audience who actively take part in the content they're polling, or use them as an advisory tool instead of a judgment. It would be interesting if they reveal some of the results of this survey. I answered the precise contrary, that polling is at the core of OSRS and they should stick with it strictly. For clarity, I answered that polling is in the core of OSRS. The poll system empowers the whole playerbase to start freeform discussion on the planned changes/additions created to Runescape itself and it is absolutely a terrific way to gather feedback and public opinion on something. That said, I really don't think the current format satisfies the best interests of Runescape.
I really don't believe the participant base is particularly good at determining which material, based on objective virtue, is good for integrity and the health of Runescape long-term. We see people vote based on self interest. Based on polling, NMZ was enjoyed by the community but it was important to remove despite that, that Jagex did. Players Buy Old School RuneScape Gold do not vote for any changes which make things harder for them but over time that becomes a drawback as material becomes simpler and achievements are diluted, these are very slight but easily add up.
After running through the poll Jagex definitely appears to be operating solo on this one. No third party firm would allow participants directly enter in their contact info (because it would mean they'd lose your business to their customer [so not a nefarious thing]) and also the only area I found kinda strange was that the telephone number request at the conclusion. I would have substituted that using a check box for recontacting and pipe-in the email that you could optionally have put in earlier for confirmation. I think you are fine answering this questionnaire when you have privacy concerns since essentially all information is unknown and it's using an industry-standard platform of Qualtrics. Jagex probably does not have market study ISO certificates but this is a quick yearly survey so they would not need to have any.
I hope this feedback encourages the staff to make surveys more concentrated to the audience who actively take part in the content they're polling, or use them as an advisory tool instead of a judgment. It would be interesting if they reveal some of the results of this survey. I answered the precise contrary, that polling is at the core of OSRS and they should stick with it strictly. For clarity, I answered that polling is in the core of OSRS. The poll system empowers the whole playerbase to start freeform discussion on the planned changes/additions created to Runescape itself and it is absolutely a terrific way to gather feedback and public opinion on something. That said, I really don't think the current format satisfies the best interests of Runescape.
I really don't believe the participant base is particularly good at determining which material, based on objective virtue, is good for integrity and the health of Runescape long-term. We see people vote based on self interest. Based on polling, NMZ was enjoyed by the community but it was important to remove despite that, that Jagex did. Players Buy Old School RuneScape Gold do not vote for any changes which make things harder for them but over time that becomes a drawback as material becomes simpler and achievements are diluted, these are very slight but easily add up.
I also wish I knew anything Old School RuneScape Gold regarding your parent firm MacArthur. They're a ghost in the World Wide Web. Furthermore, the only think I truly do know is that Jagex has pretty much given up on every game they have ever tried to earn out of RuneScape. What the flying fuck did they do with MechScape/Stellar Dawn. There was no option for updating skills or stating I really don't need you to focus on some of those choices at all. Eventually for the query,"what do you think about customer care?" An alternative should be,"What customer support?"
With the management this poll is attempting to drag people's opinions, I am very, very, very fearful. Repeatable quests, HD clients, once more hoping to push new abilities, etc.. Questions regarding how polling content works in particular is terrifying, provided Jagex's recent penchant for only forcing content that has failed multiple surveys through as integrity updates.
And of course: Asking for individuals favorite games, place of residence, occupation status, and even their PHONE NUMBER is extremely inappropriate for this kind of survey. Appears nakedly like an effort for collecting marketing data available. Editing this in today that I think about it The more I consider the phone number bit, the slimier it feels to be honest. We all know fully damn well that Jagex is not likely to call anyone who answers this poll. Leading people to give their personal information into a poll under the guise of"Wow you are so smart, perhaps we will call you to your opinions on upcoming stuff!" Is totally disgusting, and if anything, I did not respond intense enough.
The main answer I gave in this poll that I wish to get across: The final decision on any content should be made with BOTH the community AND Jagex working together to produce content that's really worth adding to Runescape. Players have demonstrated they will vote yes to a pretty absurd shit (See the Tome debacle) where Jagex should intervene and realize that asking was a mistake, while Jagex has also demonstrated that when they forge ahead on their own it doesn't work out Buy Old School RS Gold well for us either. Attempting to frame this query as a either/or is leaving out a huge amount of nuance in the issue, and this is something that applies to numerous issues discussed in the poll.
With the management this poll is attempting to drag people's opinions, I am very, very, very fearful. Repeatable quests, HD clients, once more hoping to push new abilities, etc.. Questions regarding how polling content works in particular is terrifying, provided Jagex's recent penchant for only forcing content that has failed multiple surveys through as integrity updates.
And of course: Asking for individuals favorite games, place of residence, occupation status, and even their PHONE NUMBER is extremely inappropriate for this kind of survey. Appears nakedly like an effort for collecting marketing data available. Editing this in today that I think about it The more I consider the phone number bit, the slimier it feels to be honest. We all know fully damn well that Jagex is not likely to call anyone who answers this poll. Leading people to give their personal information into a poll under the guise of"Wow you are so smart, perhaps we will call you to your opinions on upcoming stuff!" Is totally disgusting, and if anything, I did not respond intense enough.
The main answer I gave in this poll that I wish to get across: The final decision on any content should be made with BOTH the community AND Jagex working together to produce content that's really worth adding to Runescape. Players have demonstrated they will vote yes to a pretty absurd shit (See the Tome debacle) where Jagex should intervene and realize that asking was a mistake, while Jagex has also demonstrated that when they forge ahead on their own it doesn't work out Buy Old School RS Gold well for us either. Attempting to frame this query as a either/or is leaving out a huge amount of nuance in the issue, and this is something that applies to numerous issues discussed in the poll.
Yes! That is a good point,Old School RuneScape Gold I liked how the theme changed as you got further to keep it intriguing as it improved. I have not heard much about sailing but id be curious how it would work or if there has been some discussion please link! Looks interesting, I didn't find any mention of groups, ideally if it comes to fruition, which could be inserted either with a crew or even a fleet in the non PvP part. Just bear in mind a good deal of stuff that was suggested because 2015 dev site about drifting eventually came to match, such as fossil island along with the prayers.
Some queries felt like it would overlook the nuance of my answer. For instance of me playing the question is because I've got a job. There was no method that my answer could be interpreted that I'm playing less simply because I am less curious to clarify. Same with the Covid question. I'm playing since around the time. How do I answer such queries? The survey felt like that. It sure as hell didn't feel like"Your poll feedback will affect future updates and help shape Runescape's management. It's an opportunity to pitch the team your articles layouts."
Where was the part for that last part? You could hardly elaborate on few of the pre determined questions, allow a lone give entirely new thoughts or feedback about existing places within jagex you believe needs improvement that doesn't have anything to do with dev work/content updates. The poll seemed more about providing them the answers they need and push it more in that way (poll questions, images, control queries ), which makes them (jagex) as a firm look great (probably for investors) and to harvest user information (to sell to advertisers) and far less concerning the future of Runescape etc.. )
Skill improvements readily fletching and Smithing. Crafting has late game purpose with zenytes. Fletching arrows I guess and has dragon darts. Smithing has rune.make these abilities useful for late game things. For me it was construction, despite having my favorite rewards the training technique is awful to me and relies on aligned cameras etc.. I agree for methodology construction is up there. I'd love to see more world development building. Like envision you can improve how cities look (similar to burgh p rott tasks).
Even maybe as a Buy RuneScape 2007 Gold profit thought. Just like you and also you become jobs that are assigned and a service fee and xp, respectively. Less xp/hr than the methods but turning to some money for people that don't need to drop 30m on 83 con. Agree. Development construction would be fantastic. Each major region could have its own guild with projects that are exceptional to be constructed throughout the area. As opposed to profit I would be interested in experience.
Some queries felt like it would overlook the nuance of my answer. For instance of me playing the question is because I've got a job. There was no method that my answer could be interpreted that I'm playing less simply because I am less curious to clarify. Same with the Covid question. I'm playing since around the time. How do I answer such queries? The survey felt like that. It sure as hell didn't feel like"Your poll feedback will affect future updates and help shape Runescape's management. It's an opportunity to pitch the team your articles layouts."
Where was the part for that last part? You could hardly elaborate on few of the pre determined questions, allow a lone give entirely new thoughts or feedback about existing places within jagex you believe needs improvement that doesn't have anything to do with dev work/content updates. The poll seemed more about providing them the answers they need and push it more in that way (poll questions, images, control queries ), which makes them (jagex) as a firm look great (probably for investors) and to harvest user information (to sell to advertisers) and far less concerning the future of Runescape etc.. )
Skill improvements readily fletching and Smithing. Crafting has late game purpose with zenytes. Fletching arrows I guess and has dragon darts. Smithing has rune.make these abilities useful for late game things. For me it was construction, despite having my favorite rewards the training technique is awful to me and relies on aligned cameras etc.. I agree for methodology construction is up there. I'd love to see more world development building. Like envision you can improve how cities look (similar to burgh p rott tasks).
Even maybe as a Buy RuneScape 2007 Gold profit thought. Just like you and also you become jobs that are assigned and a service fee and xp, respectively. Less xp/hr than the methods but turning to some money for people that don't need to drop 30m on 83 con. Agree. Development construction would be fantastic. Each major region could have its own guild with projects that are exceptional to be constructed throughout the area. As opposed to profit I would be interested in experience.
Robert Williams, NBA 2K21 MT also known as Time Lord, is the starting center for the Boston Celtics. He will not blow you away with his scoring or playmaking, but his rebounding stats from 2K are all excellent. Though he doesn't possess the capability to back this up, Williams does not have a lot of trouble cleaning the glasswith a 91 Offensive Rebound rating and an 87 Defensive Rebound rating. His rating has increased by an impressive seven factors. As a center, his presence in the paint isn't something to brush either. His 93 Close Forged rating and 90 Reputation Dunk can punish opposing teams on a single end of the courtroom, although his Block rating of 97 can look after any player who is not careful on the opposite end.
Immanuel Quickley: 71-79, Up Eight Points: Has He Cooled Down? Immanuel Quickley would have been the most improved player of the year (in relation to NBA 2K overall gains ) somewhat earlier in the summer, but he settled in a score of 79 (up from 71). Beginning at a 71 overall after being drafted and reaching an 80 overall in his summit, Quickley has amazed Knicks fans and 2K21 players. Quickley is a Deep-Range Shot Creator which helps everyone else on his staff get the very best looks potential and knock down shots from outside the perimeter.
LaMelo Ball: 77-85Up Nine Matters: The Very Best Rookie In The Game? As the third overall pick by the Charlotte Hornets in the 2020-2021 NBA draft, LaMelo Ball had a lot to prove as a rookie coming into the NBA. His experience playing expert basketball overseas (and with high school mates that have also made it to the league) helped prepare him.Ball now has the honor of becoming the highest-rated newcomer of his draft course after leading performances. Should you need a playmaker with good External Scoring stats, look no further than the youngest Ball brother. Still another eight-point jump.
As the Knicks are one of the best clubs in the East, Randle is currently the 19th greatest player in the sport. To reflect that, he has jumped by nine points, among the greatest boosts since NBA 2K21's release. Much like Zach Lavine, he awakened and turned into an Olympic participant. Randle can score anywhere on the floor as a 3-Level Scorer and get the defensive rebounds also. With a 98 Buy NBA 2K21 MT Coins offensive wake along with his high stats, then you can succeed with Randle in any game mode. Whether it's alongside him in MyCareer or simulating the entire year in MyNBA, The Knicks' success could be mostly attributed to the development of Julius Randle.
During the years, NBA 2K has tried to be as realistic as you can when it comes to simulating the feel NBA 2K21 MT of genuine basketball and the NBA season. With game modes such as MyCareer or MyNBA (previously MyGM or MyLeague), participant ratings and stats are crucial. NBA 2K21 regularly updates the ratings of its players during the season to match participant performances. Player score changes take everything into consideration, from poor off-season performances (which could lead to evaluations to plummet) to the newest NBA matches.
In the launch of NBA 2k21 on current-gen consoles up to the last few games of this NBA season, NBA 2K developers have had to correct the overall evaluations of novice players and breakout All-Stars alike. Although the evaluation system is not always ideal (and occasionally makes no sense), the evaluations are adjusted to try to properly resemble the players' real life counterparts and what kind of seasons they are having. The system has handled some players much superior than many others.
Jerami Grant: 77-83Up Six points: Motor City's Number One Choice. The Detroit Pistons had not been having the best season. Their star player, Blake Griffin, was bought out and their lottery pick in Killian Hayes suffered from a devastating injury early in the season. Therefore, Jerami Grant needed to step up and be the key player on the group. Due to Grant's strong Interior Scoring stats and large Stamina and Hustle ratings, the Detroit Pistons perform well in a very unlucky season for the franchise. Much like Christian Wood, Grant might be your first choice, but his ratings as a Slashing Four can provide you a few buckets as you take advantage of his abrupt improvement (and six-point boost).
He won't blow you away with his scoring or playmaking, but his rebounding stats from 2K are all excellent. Although he does not have the Badges to back it up, Williams does not have a lot of trouble cleaning the glasswith a 91 Offensive Rebound score and an 87 Defensive Rebound rating. His rating has increased by an impressive seven factors. As a middle, his presence in the paint is not something to brush off either. His 93 Close Shot score and 90 Standing Dunk can penalize opposing teams on a single end of the court, while his Block rating of 97 can look after any participant who is not careful on the opposite end.
Immanuel Quickley: 71-79, Up Nine Points: Has He Cooled Down? Immanuel Quickley would have been the most improved player of the year (in relation to NBA 2K overall gains ) Buy 2K21 MT a bit earlier in the summer, but he depended at a rating of 79 (up from 71). Beginning at a 71 overall after being reaching an 80 complete in his summit, Quickley has amazed Knicks lovers and 2K21 players. Quickley is a Deep-Range Shot Creator which helps everyone else on his team get the very best looks possible and knock down shots from outside the perimeter.
In the launch of NBA 2k21 on current-gen consoles up to the last few games of this NBA season, NBA 2K developers have had to correct the overall evaluations of novice players and breakout All-Stars alike. Although the evaluation system is not always ideal (and occasionally makes no sense), the evaluations are adjusted to try to properly resemble the players' real life counterparts and what kind of seasons they are having. The system has handled some players much superior than many others.
Jerami Grant: 77-83Up Six points: Motor City's Number One Choice. The Detroit Pistons had not been having the best season. Their star player, Blake Griffin, was bought out and their lottery pick in Killian Hayes suffered from a devastating injury early in the season. Therefore, Jerami Grant needed to step up and be the key player on the group. Due to Grant's strong Interior Scoring stats and large Stamina and Hustle ratings, the Detroit Pistons perform well in a very unlucky season for the franchise. Much like Christian Wood, Grant might be your first choice, but his ratings as a Slashing Four can provide you a few buckets as you take advantage of his abrupt improvement (and six-point boost).
He won't blow you away with his scoring or playmaking, but his rebounding stats from 2K are all excellent. Although he does not have the Badges to back it up, Williams does not have a lot of trouble cleaning the glasswith a 91 Offensive Rebound score and an 87 Defensive Rebound rating. His rating has increased by an impressive seven factors. As a middle, his presence in the paint is not something to brush off either. His 93 Close Shot score and 90 Standing Dunk can penalize opposing teams on a single end of the court, while his Block rating of 97 can look after any participant who is not careful on the opposite end.
Immanuel Quickley: 71-79, Up Nine Points: Has He Cooled Down? Immanuel Quickley would have been the most improved player of the year (in relation to NBA 2K overall gains ) Buy 2K21 MT a bit earlier in the summer, but he depended at a rating of 79 (up from 71). Beginning at a 71 overall after being reaching an 80 complete in his summit, Quickley has amazed Knicks lovers and 2K21 players. Quickley is a Deep-Range Shot Creator which helps everyone else on his team get the very best looks possible and knock down shots from outside the perimeter.
During the years,2K MT has tried to be as realistic as possible when it comes to mimicking the feel of genuine basketball and the NBA season. With game modes like MyCareer or MyNBA (formerly MyGM or MyLeague), player ratings and stats are crucial. NBA 2K21 frequently updates the ratings of its players during the entire year to match player performances. Player rating changes take everything into account, from poor off-season performances (which can cause evaluations to plummet) into the newest NBA matches.
Even though the rating system isn't always perfect (and sometimes makes no sense), the evaluations are adjusted to try to properly resemble the players' real-life counterparts and what sort of seasons they are having. The system has treated some players much superior than others.
Jerami Grant: 77-83Up Six factors: Motor City's Number One Choice. The Detroit Pistons had not been having the best season. Their star player, Blake Griffin, was bought out and their lottery selection from Killian Hayes suffered from a catastrophic injury early in the season. As such, Jerami Grant needed to step up and become the primary player on the group. Thanks to Grant's strong Interior Scoring stats and large Stamina and Hustle evaluations, the Detroit Pistons perform well in a really unlucky season for the franchise. Much like Christian Wood, Grant may be your first option, but his ratings as a Slashing Four can give you a few buckets as you make the most of his abrupt improvement (and six-point increase ).
Robert Williams: 74-81, Up Seven Factors: Time Lord Stops All. Though he does not possess the Badges to back it up, Williams doesn't have much trouble cleaning the glasswith a 91 Offensive Rebound rating and an 87 Defensive Rebound rating. His rating has improved by an impressive seven points. As a middle, his presence in the paint is not something to brush either. His 93 Close Shot rating and 90 Reputation Dunk can penalize opposing teams on a single end of the court, while his Block score of 97 can take care of any participant who isn't careful on the opposite end.
Immanuel Quickley could have been the most improved player of the year (in relation toBuy NBA 2K MT overall gains ) a bit earlier in the season, but he depended in a score of 79 (up from 71). Starting at a 71 overall after being reaching an 80 complete in his peak, Quickley has amazed Knicks fans and 2K21 players. Quickley is a Deep-Range Shot Creator that helps everyone else on his team get the very best looks potential and knock down shots from outside the perimeter.
Even though the rating system isn't always perfect (and sometimes makes no sense), the evaluations are adjusted to try to properly resemble the players' real-life counterparts and what sort of seasons they are having. The system has treated some players much superior than others.
Jerami Grant: 77-83Up Six factors: Motor City's Number One Choice. The Detroit Pistons had not been having the best season. Their star player, Blake Griffin, was bought out and their lottery selection from Killian Hayes suffered from a catastrophic injury early in the season. As such, Jerami Grant needed to step up and become the primary player on the group. Thanks to Grant's strong Interior Scoring stats and large Stamina and Hustle evaluations, the Detroit Pistons perform well in a really unlucky season for the franchise. Much like Christian Wood, Grant may be your first option, but his ratings as a Slashing Four can give you a few buckets as you make the most of his abrupt improvement (and six-point increase ).
Robert Williams: 74-81, Up Seven Factors: Time Lord Stops All. Though he does not possess the Badges to back it up, Williams doesn't have much trouble cleaning the glasswith a 91 Offensive Rebound rating and an 87 Defensive Rebound rating. His rating has improved by an impressive seven points. As a middle, his presence in the paint is not something to brush either. His 93 Close Shot rating and 90 Reputation Dunk can penalize opposing teams on a single end of the court, while his Block score of 97 can take care of any participant who isn't careful on the opposite end.
Immanuel Quickley could have been the most improved player of the year (in relation toBuy NBA 2K MT overall gains ) a bit earlier in the season, but he depended in a score of 79 (up from 71). Starting at a 71 overall after being reaching an 80 complete in his peak, Quickley has amazed Knicks fans and 2K21 players. Quickley is a Deep-Range Shot Creator that helps everyone else on his team get the very best looks potential and knock down shots from outside the perimeter.
