effectivelabindia's blog


This Salt Spray Chamber is made for corrosion tests on coating products and that Standard,  is adopted by the Indian standards institution for conducting salt spray tests. In this test standard, there is a direct relation between salt spray resistance and corrosion resistance present in other mediums. This is because the corrosion progress is affected by several factors such as; protective film formation. Due to this, results obtained from the test can not be counted directly. Moreover, Anodized Aluminium which has a coating thickness below then 3 micrometers is not recommended for this test.
In addition, if the final value observed in the reporting of test results is rounded off, then it shall be done following IS: 2-1960.

Scope

In this test standard, the reagent apparatus and procedure of conducting the test are specified for assessing the quality of coatings made following the product’s specifications. The type of test specimen is not specified by this test standard. The detail of the test specimen is provided in the specifications of the product.

Test solution

Dissolve sodium chloride in distilled water to produce a concentration of 50+ -5 g/l. Sodium chloride should be white and give a colourless solution in the water. Also, it should be free from nickel and copper and contain a 0.1% concentration of sodium iodide. Also, take care of the pH. If the pH is more than 7.0 then investigate the presence of impurities in salt and water.
* Adjusting the pH of the salt solution is important so that the pH of the sprayed solution will be between 6.5 and 7.2. Kept the pH control based on electronic measurement at 25 degrees. Moreover, any necessary correction shall be made by adding a solution of hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide.
Filter the solution before placing it into the reservoir of the apparatus. This filtration removes the presence of any solid matter. The solid matter might block the spraying device apparatus.

Apparatus

The apparatus of the test should be:

  • A spray cabinet
  • Means of supplying and controlling heat.
  • Means of spraying the salt solution
  • Reservoir
  • Atomizers are made up of inert material.
  • Two suitable collecting devices.
  • Clean the apparatus before use.

Method of exposing test specimens

  • Expose the test specimens into the test chamber.
  • The angle of exposing samples is very important. 20 degrees vertical and be within the limits of 10-20 degrees in all cases.
  • Arrange the specimens, so that they should not come in contact with one another.
  • Support for specimens should be made up of inert non-metallic materials such as plastic or glass.
Conditions for operating.
  • The temperature inside the cabinet shall be 35+ -2 degrees.
  • The solution should have a sodium chloride concentration of 50+ -10 g/l and a pH ranging from 6.5 to 7.2
  • The sprayed solution should not be used against it.

Test duration

  • The test period should be designated according to the specifications of the coatings.
  • General exposure periods which are recommended are;
  • 2h, 6h, 24h, 48h, 96h, and 240h.
  • Do not interrupt the spraying during the test period.
  • Do not inspect the specimens frequently.
Cleaning the specimens after the test

At the end of the test, remove the specimens from the salt spray chamber testing cabinet and allow them to dry. Remove the residues of the spray solution before examining them. A suitable method for this is to dip the specimens in clean water with a temperature of less than 40 degrees.

Evaluation of result.

  • After that, evaluate the signs of corrosion on specimens.
  • Test report
  • After all the process, make a test report. The report of the test should contain the information about test procedure. General details that are required for reporting a test are.
  • Description of the coatings to be tested.
  • The shape of the test specimen.
  • Preparation of the test specimen.
  • Characteristics of coatings.
  • Number of the test specimens.
  • Method of cleaning test specimens after the test.
  • The angle of inclining the test surfaces.
  • Temperature of the test.
  • Duration of the test.
  • Properties of the test panel.

Click for Download Standard IS 9844-1981 PDF

Source of content: https://effectivelabindia.com/salt-spray-test-chamber-standard-is-9844-1981-pdf-download-now/


Two popular techniques for assessing the corrosion resistance of materials and coatings are the salt fog test and the salt spray test. Although the objective of both tests is to replicate the severe circumstances seen in industrial and maritime settings, there are notable distinctions between them. Selecting the right test technique for a given application requires an understanding of these distinctions.

Why Do Salt Fog Tests?

To evaluate a material's or coating's resistance to corrosion, the salt fog test, sometimes called the salt mist test or salt spray testing, is carried out. In a closed chamber, test specimens are exposed to a regulated mist of saltwater solution, usually containing sodium chloride (NaCl).

The Salt Spray Test's Objective

The purpose of the salt spray test, which is comparable to the salt fog test, is to assess the corrosion resistance of materials and coatings. But in this test, test specimens are directly exposed to a continuous spray of saltwater solution, as opposed to creating a fog of the solution. The aim of the simulation is to replicate the corrosive impact of saltwater spray that is present in maritime settings, including ship hulls and offshore constructions.

Recognising the Testing Processes

Configuring the Examination Environment
Both the salt spray test and the salt fog test need for specialised tools and chambers known as Salt Spray Chamber that can maintain exact levels of humidity, temperature, and salt concentration. To guarantee that test specimens are exposed to the salt solution uniformly, they are meticulously prepared and mounted.

Using Salt Solution

The saltwater solution is atomized into a fine mist and injected into the salt spray test chamber to engulf the test specimens in the salt fog test. The salt spray test, on the other hand, entails directly applying the salt water solution through a nozzle or spray system, resulting in a persistent mist that touches the test specimens.

Observation and Assessment

The specimens are routinely examined for indications of corrosion, such as rust development or changes in appearance, during the testing period. The test period is contingent upon the relevant standards and the planned application of the materials or coatings under examination.

Important distinctions between the Salt Spray Test and the Salt Fog Test Test Duration

When opposed to the salt spray test, the salt fog test usually lasts less time. The salt spray test frequently calls for lengthier exposure durations, ranging from days to weeks, whereas the salt fog test might last anywhere from a few hours to several hundred hours.

Examination Setting
In order to simulate the effects of excessive humidity and salt particles in the air, test specimens are subjected to a mist of saltwater solution within a closed room. The salt spray test, on the other hand, replicates the corrosive effects of direct seawater contact by continuously spraying the specimens with a saltwater solution.

Test Examples
The two approaches may not test the same kinds of materials and coatings. The salt spray test is frequently used to evaluate metallic surfaces for corrosion resistance, whereas the salt fog test may be more appropriate for evaluating painted surfaces and organic coatings. Both tests may be used to evaluate metals, alloys, and protective coatings.

Interpretation of Test Results
Depending on the methodology, test findings might be interpreted differently. Visually determining the degree of corrosion is often made easier by the salt fog test's tendency to create more consistent corrosion patterns throughout the test specimens. However, localised damage from the salt spray test might necessitate a more thorough investigation in order to precisely determine the corrosion resistance level.

Relevance across a Range of Industries

A multitude of sectors, including automotive, aerospace, marine, and construction, rely heavily on the salt spray and fog tests to guarantee the robustness and dependability of materials and coatings. Through the use of accelerated corrosion conditions to test specimens, these tests assist manufacturers in detecting possible flaws and enhancing the performance of their products.

  • Benefits of the Salt Fog Test
  • offers a rather rapid and economical way to assess a material's or coating's resistance to corrosion.
  • mimics the damaging impacts of salinity-rich atmospheres seen in coastal and marine areas.
  • Appropriate for evaluating painted surfaces and organic coatings.

Benefits of the Salt Spray Test

  • Simulates the harsh conditions of direct seawater exposure, making it ideal for evaluating the corrosion resistance of metallic surfaces.
  • Allows for the assessment of localized corrosion phenomena, such as pitting and crevice corrosion.
  • Widely recognized and standardized test method, facilitating comparison of results across different laboratories and manufacturers.
Typical Uses in Sectors

Many industries utilise both the salt spray and salt fog tests extensively because corrosion resistance is a crucial component of product performance and dependability. Typical uses for them include:

  • assessment of car parts, including the engine, body panels, and chassis.
  • Aerospace materials and coatings are tested for use in aircraft structures and parts.
  • Evaluation of offshore constructions and maritime equipment subjected to saltwater conditions.
  • supervision of the quality of the building materials used in infrastructure, buildings, and bridges.
How to Decide Between the Salt Spray and Salt Fog Tests

The kind of material or coating being tested, the intended degree of test severity, and the particular needs of the application all play a role in choosing the best test technique. When deciding between the salt spray test and the salt fog test, take into account the following recommendations:

Material Compatibility: Establish which material or coating is more appropriate for the corrosive environments that the salt fog or salt spray tests represent.

Test Length: Take into account how long the test must last in order to get significant findings. those using salt fog usually last less time than those using salt spray.

Severity of Conditions: Determine how severe the environmental factors will be in the application that your substance or coating is meant for. Compared to salt spray tests, which simulate a more severe, direct exposure to saltwater spray, salt fog testing could offer a more mild simulation of corrosion. Select a testing strategy that most closely resembles anticipated real-world circumstances.

Standard Compliance: To ascertain which test technique is advised or necessary for your application, refer to the pertinent industry standards and specifications. Adherence to industry-specific and regionally-specific corrosion testing criteria guarantees uniformity and comparability of results.


Two techniques are used to assess a material's resistance to corrosion, specifically for metals, coatings, and finishes: the immersion test and the salt spray test

Below is a summary of how the two differ from one another:


Type of Exposure:


Immersion Test: This test involves immersing the test specimen for a predetermined amount of time in a corrosive solution, usually water or an electrolyte solution.
In a controlled salt spray chamber, the test specimen is subjected to a continuous or intermittent spray of a saltwater solution, often in the form of a saltwater mist or fog.

Corrosive Agent:

Immersion Test: The material corrodes as a result of a chemical interaction with the fluid it is submerged in. It is possible to select the solution to mimic particular environmental conditions, including saltwater, acidic, alkaline, or other corrosive environments.
Salt Spray Test: Compared to ambient air, the corrosive effect of salt (usually sodium chloride) in the form of a mist or fog speeds up the corrosion process. This is the main cause of the corrosion.

Time and Circumstances:

Immersion Test: Usually carried out over longer periods—days, weeks, or even months—than salt spray experiments. To replicate real-world situations, the test settings could include temperature and agitation fluctuations.
Salt Spray Test: Usually carried out for shorter periods, from a few hours to a few days. Testing standards dictate how the test circumstances, which include temperature, humidity, and salt content, are regulated and standardised.

Application:

Immersion Test: Frequently used to evaluate a material's or coating's overall resistance to corrosion, particularly when it comes to materials meant for extended exposure to corrosive environments like maritime applications.
Salt Spray Test: Often used to quickly assess corrosion resistance, particularly when contrasting various materials or coatings under circumstances that promote corrosion.

Criteria for Evaluation:

Immersion Test: After the test specimen has been submerged for a certain amount of time, the degree and kind of corrosion (such as uniform corrosion or pitting corrosion) are observed.


Salt Spray Test: The corrosion is assessed visually and by measuring the corrosion products (rust, for example) on the specimen's surface. These measurements are frequently made using standardised grading scales or by tracking the corrosion's evolution over time.


while both immersion and salt spray tests evaluate corrosion resistance, they vary in the settings, application, duration, corrosive chemicals used, and assessment standards. These tests are useful testing instruments that support quality control and product development procedures by forecasting how coatings and materials will behave in corrosive environments.

Advancements in Corrosion Testing Techniques: A Comprehensive Overview

A variety of corrosion tests are frequently employed to assess a material's or coating's resistance to corrosion. Among the most well-liked ones are:

  1. Salt Spray Test (ASTM B117, ISO 9227): This test simulates extreme environmental conditions by subjecting materials to a continuous or sporadic salt spray (fog), which accelerates corrosion. It is frequently employed for rapid corrosion resistance assessments, especially with metallic coatings. A salt spray test chamber provides a controlled atmosphere in which the test is carried out. These chambers guarantee the repeatability and standardisation of test findings by maintaining constant humidity, temperature, and salt content. Typically, the chamber is made up of a salt solution reservoir, a spray nozzle system, controls to adjust humidity and temperature, and an enclosure that is resistant to corrosion.
  2. Cyclic Corrosion Test (CCT): This entails exposing materials to a variety of corrosive conditions in alternate cycles, including humidity, salt spray, and drying conditions. It is a more faithful simulation of real-world settings than testing using continuous salt spray.
  3. The ASTM G31 Immersion Test: Involves measures of a material's resistance to corrosion by submerging it for a lengthy amount of time in a corrosive solution, such as water or electrolytes. It's frequently applied to the assessment of materials meant to be submerged in certain settings, such as marine applications.
  4. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS): This method determines a material's surface impedance to an alternating current, revealing details on the corrosion processes and resistance. It's applied to corrosion behaviour analysis, both qualitative and quantitative.
  5. Potentiodynamic Polarisation Test (ASTM G5, ASTM G61): This test plots the polarisation curves of materials to determine how they behave electrochemically. Corrosion rates, corrosion potentials, and other electrochemical characteristics may be found using it.
  6. The Kesternich Test (ISO 6988, DIN 50018) evaluates a material's resistance to acid corrosion by subjecting it to acidic conditions with elevated sulphur dioxide concentrations. It is frequently employed to assess metallic materials subjected to sulfur-containing industrial atmospheres.
  7. Profession Test (ASTM D5894): This test assesses the resistance of coated specimens to corrosion and delamination by exposing them to cycles of salt spray, humidity, and dry conditions.
  8. Humidity Test (ASTM D1748): This test puts materials in high-humidity environments to see how resistant they are to corrosion and deterioration brought on by moisture. It is frequently used to mimic mixed environmental impacts in combination with other corrosion testing.

These corrosion tests vary in their methodologies, test conditions, and applications, but they all play essential roles in assessing the corrosion resistance of materials and coatings in various environments. The selection of a specific test depends on factors such as the intended application, regulatory requirements, and the expected environmental conditions faced by the material.


The electroplating of chromium is termed hard chrome. It strengthens corrosion-resistant, metal surfaces and it is water-resistant. Although it is corrosion resistant it may face the effects of corrosion under a high salt-laden environment.

Role of salt spray test chamber in hard chroming?

salt spray chamber helps assess the corrosion resistance properties of different coatings. It also helps in assessing the performance and durability of hard chrome in a corrosive environment. It evaluates the quality of hard chrome in the following ways. Hard chrome coatings are exposed to a highly corrosive environment. The same conditions are simulated in the chamber as are in marine or coastal Temperatures. The specimens are placed in an accelerated and controlled corrosion for a long duration to assess their corrosion resilience. 

This testing allows the users to see the microscopic defects that cannot be seen by the naked eye. 


Effective Lab India always believed in quality testing due to its quality testing equipment. Their Salt spray test chamber meets the quality standards which makes it a good choice for manufacturers.

However, by conducting this test, the performance of the products can be predicted. It allows the manufacturers to estimate the long-term performance of hard chrome coatings in real-world scenarios.

For optimizing the composition of hard chrome coatings, a salt spray test chamber is an effective and beneficial tool. The results obtained by this testing instrument are used by the manufacturers to prepare surface techniques or for formulation to increase the durability, quality and performance of hard chrome.

Overall, assessing the performance of hard chrome in a corrosive environment is necessary by corrosion testing. To ensure a thorough evaluation of coatings, manufacturers integrate with other methods frequently.

Applications of hard chrome

The required thickness of hard chrome in various situations is understood with the help of a salt spray test chamber Jupiter Series. This information makes it a reliable choice for several tasks where metal parts need a tough shield. However, the following are some applications of hard chrome, you can have a look at them.

  • Piping
  • Faucets
  • Cylinders and hydraulic pistons
  • Shafts
  • Rotors
  • Textiles
  • Aerospace components
  • Screws, dies, and rolls
  • Printing components 

Now, the function of Effective Lab India’s salt spray testing chamber is observed in hard chrome industries.


In the realm of corrosion testing and research, FRP (Fiber Reinforced Plastic) body salt spray chambers have emerged as indispensable tools. A salt spray chamber is used for evaluating the corrosion resistance properties of coatings and irons etc. It is the most advanced and reliable tool for testing corrosion of different coatings. It is used in a range of industries such as aerospace, marine, and automotive. In this test chamber, a controlled environment is created by using a salt spray. This environment is salt-laden and it recreates the conditions that are exposed to materials in the real world.

Besides this, you should have to know the role of FRP in enhancing the test results. So, let’s take a look.

FRP Body Salt Spray Chamber

Old Salt spray chambers were made up of stainless steel which ensures their durability and corrosion-resistant properties. However, in recent years, fibre-reinforced plastic (FRP) has been used in the manufacturing of salt spray test chambers. FRP becomes an ideal choice for quality testing due to its numerous advantages over traditional materials. Let’s take a look at the advantages of FRP.

Advantages of FRP Body Salt Spray Test Chamber

FRP corrosion testing chamber is helpful for your testing module in:

  • FRP is highly corrosion resistant which makes it ideal for use in a Salt spray test chamber
  • FRP is resistant to different chemicals. This resistance makes it ideal for testing a wide range of metals and coatings.
  • It has a longer lifespan and it requires less maintenance like the test chambers made up of metals.
  • FRP is lighter in weight than stainless steel. Hence, the chamber is easy to transport and carry.
  • Test chambers made up of FRP do not require painting and other protective coatings because they are not susceptible to corrosion.
Durability and Corrosion Resistance

FRP is renowned for its exceptional durability and corrosion resistance properties. Unlike traditional metal chambers, FRP bodies do not corrode when exposed to salt spray environments. This durability ensures the longevity of the salt spray chamber, allowing for consistent and reliable testing over time without the need for frequent repairs or replacements.

Lightweight Construction

One of the key benefits of FRP salt spray chambers is their lightweight construction. Compared to metal chambers, FRP chambers are significantly lighter, making them easier to transport, install, and maneuver within testing facilities. This lightweight nature also reduces the structural load on the testing facility, contributing to overall cost savings and operational efficiency.

Versatility and Customization Options

FRP offers unparalleled versatility and customization options, allowing manufacturers to tailor salt spray chambers to meet specific testing requirements. From chamber size and configuration to the inclusion of additional features such as humidity control systems, FRP chambers can be customized to accommodate various testing needs. This flexibility ensures that manufacturers can conduct accurate and comprehensive corrosion testing across a wide range of applications and industries.

Chemical Resistance

In addition to withstanding salt spray environments, FRP salt spray chambers exhibit excellent chemical resistance. This resistance extends to a variety of corrosive substances, including acids, alkalis, and solvents, ensuring the integrity of the chamber and the accuracy of test results even in harsh testing conditions.

Manufacturers

EffectiveLab India is a leading manufacturer of salt spray test chambers. Effective Lab India offers a wide range of FRP salt spray test chambers to meet the specific needs of the customers. The test chamber made up by Effective Lab is reliable, durable, and easy to use. Moreover, there are numerous options and features in this machine as per International standards. 

Moreover, it is easy to use and it doesn’t need any special training to operate this machine. Due to the FRP material, this machine is purchased on a large scale in India. 

Overall, the FRP salt spray test chamber is the best equipment for testing the corrosion resistance of different coatings and metals.


A Salt spray test is conducted to test the resistance of metals and coatings against corrosion. Corrosion affects the coatings of metals badly and changes their properties, so it’s important to test the corrosion resistance properties of the materials before selling them in the market. This test is conducted by using a salt spray chamber. There are different types of salt spray test chambers that are being used according to the specific test type.

Moreover, the period for the salt spray test is according to the sample to be tested. There are different periods for conducting salt spray tests. Let us discuss.

What is the 720-hour salt spray test?

In the 720-hour salt spray test, the sample is exposed to the test chamber for 720 hours. The temperature of the test is set to +35°C +1.1°C/ -1.7°C. Moreover, the compound used in the test is 5% sodium chloride and 95% water. In this test, users will have to wait for 720 hours until the exposure of salt spray.

What is the 24-hour salt spray test?

In a 24-hour salt spray test, the specimens are placed for 24 hours. In this test, the sample to be tested is continuously exposed to the salt spray chamber during the testing period. The effects of corrosion on each sample should be noted in detail after every 24 hours. Moreover, after the predetermined time, the specimens are removed from the chamber and corrosion resistance is evaluated.

What is the 500-hour salt spray test?

500-hour salt spray is intended to predict the performance of oil to protect metals from rust. In this test, steel panels are dipped in an oil test and then they are placed in a salt fog chamber for a predetermined time (500 hours). For rust development, panels are evaluated daily. Hence, the rust on metals is reported accordingly.

What is the 3000-hour salt spray test?

salt spray test chamber is conducted to test the corrosion resistance of different products. In this test, the samples are placed in a closed chamber and then a thick metal fog is exposed to them for simulating severely corrosive conditions. A sodium chloride solution with a pH range of 6.5 to 7.2 is employed in this test and the time duration for this test is typically from 8 to 3000 hours.

What is the 480-hour salt spray test?

In this test, the specimens are placed into a closed testing chamber. A high concentration of salts is exposed on the specimens for 480 hours. After the set period, the specimens are taken out and examined if there are any signs of corrosion on them.

Product protection during storage and transit is greatly aided by packaging. But if the structural integrity of the packaging is damaged, even the most well-thought-out packaging might collapse under stress. In order to find package design flaws before it's too late, a box compression tester is essential in this situation.

Overview of the Box Compression Tester

A specific Effective Lab India equipment called a Digital Box Compression Tester is used to assess the compressive strength of packaging containers, cartons, and corrugated boxes. It replicates the handling, stacking, and transit circumstances these packages experience.

Value of Packaging Design

Not only can good package design make items seem better, but it also protects them from things like dampness, impact, and compression. A well-designed packaging improves consumer happiness and brand reputation in addition to maintaining the product's quality.

Comprehending the Box Compression Tester

How It Operates

Testers for box compression exert pressure on the package until it breaks. This aids in figuring out the highest weight the box can support without buckling or collapsing.

Box Compression Tester Types

Box compression testers come in a variety of variants, including fully automatic, semi-automatic, and manual versions. Different testing accuracy and automation levels are available for each kind.

Box compression testers come in various types, each serving specific testing needs and offering different levels of automation and precision. Here are the main types:

  1. Manual Box Compression Tester: These testers require manual operation, where the user applies pressure to the box using a hand-operated mechanism. While they may be more affordable, they offer less precision and require more effort from the operator.
  2. Semi-Automatic Box Compression Tester: Semi-automatic testers combine manual and automated features. They typically involve manual placement of the box on the testing platform, but the application of pressure is automated, controlled by the machine.
  3. Fully Automatic Box Compression Tester(Digital Box Compression Tester-Computerised): Fully automatic testers are the most advanced type, offering high levels of automation and precision. They can perform tests without the need for manual intervention, including box positioning and pressure application. These testers are ideal for high-volume testing environments where efficiency and accuracy are paramount.
Finding Design Weaknesses in Packaging and the Effects of Poor Packaging

Defective packing may result in harmed products, a rise in returns, and a decline in client confidence. Businesses may also incur extra expenses as a result of replacements and compensation claims.

The Value of Examination

To find any flaws in package design, it is imperative to conduct routine testing using a box compression tester. Businesses can avoid costly failures by implementing critical upgrades to identify fundamental issues early on.

Preparing for and Conducting the Box Compression Test

Make sure the box is successfully constructed and error-free prior to running the test. For accurate results, place the box in the centre of the compression tester's platform.

Method of Testing

Using the Box Compression Test Machine, gradually apply pressure to the box until it collapses or achieves the predefined load. Note the highest load that was applied as well as any obvious failure or deformation symptoms.

Examining Test Results

Examine the test findings when it's over to find any areas where the package design is lacking. Frequently occurring problems might include weak boxes, bad glue, or incorrect folding methods.

Taking Care of Weaknesses

Take the required action to remedy the flaws found based on the test results. Redesigning the packaging, utilising more durable materials, or enhancing the production procedures might all be part of this.

Using a Box Compression Tester Has Its Advantages

Accuracy: Offers exact box strength readings.
Cost-effective: Reduces losses and helps guard against product damage.
Quality assurance: Ensuring packaging complies with industry norms and requirements is known as quality assurance.

Upcoming Developments in Packaging Examination

Future packaging testing is probably going to witness more automation and data analytics integration due to technological improvements. Businesses will be able to carry out more thorough testing and maximise the durability and efficiency of package designs thanks to this.

In summary
To sum up, a box compression strength tester is a useful instrument for spotting flaws in package layout and guaranteeing the integrity of goods while they are being transported and stored. Businesses may reduce the risk of product damage and improve customer satisfaction by regularly testing their products and correcting any faults that are found.